Planned communities are generally for retirees. When they are not for retirees only, then very strict rules, legal, must be invoked and even state that developers must meet strict rules with each and every proposal. If you want kids in a planned community--then plan for them. Add excess recreation and supervision, and yes, even for teen-agers. Let's face it: this planned community crap has been going around for scores of years. Golf players and others have been developing them (with their name) for many, many years. A certain golden golfer, whom I know, has let his name be used to do these things to the tune of him being ultra rich. People are told that he owns lot #X, and will build his home there. He does, but sells it when the sell-out occurs. He also gets three times out of it what he put into it. (fuzzy, lee, jack, and arnold's house you know?)

The law of the land is not the "highest and best use" and it never has been.

Peter Pfeifer demanded TDK because he said it would relieve traffic; he lied.

Straighten out Rockaway Road, that's fine. TDK, on the other hand, is developer greed and political lies.

First, let's set the record straight with Peter. Yet another long winded, vacous letter with no data and no facts. I can forgive the poor grammar and incomplete sentences but the absence of any factual support renders his weekly drivel useless. Your slander of Mr. Maxwell was your signature, Rick Price dirty politics and I for one do not like it. For now, you are convinced that by supplicating to the Coweta developer crowd you will hang on to your commission seat. You will not.

As for "fayettecountyreality", you, too, suffer from general ignorance. You say "law of the land...it's highest and best use." Your knowledge apparently consists of parrotting what the last person told you. Highest and best use is not the standard. If it were, Jim Pace would be entitled to build a medical waste incinerator and toxic dump. Oh, I'm sorry, they already sold that to the PD.