Sheriff puts top detective ‘on leave’

Fri, 09/08/2006 - 3:03pm
By: John Munford

Internal investigation to focus on security detail for youth baseball team

The chief detective of the Fayette County Sheriff’s Office was placed on administrative leave Friday pending an internal investigation sparked by a TV news report about two deputies being paid to provide security for a local youth baseball team at a tournament in Tennessee.

Fayette County Sheriff Randall Johnson confirmed the status of Lt. Col. Bruce Jordan Friday afternoon. Johnson said he hoped the investigation would be wrapped up by Tuesday or Wednesday and he will elaborate further once the investigation is concluded.

Johnson did say he was “disappointed” with the way the matter appears at this point.

Jordan’s son Hayden plays for the team that received the security detail, the Fayette Bulldogs, a team in the Fayette County’s Recreation Department league, Jordan confirmed.

The investigative report on Fox5 Atlanta focused on two detectives in Jordan's Criminal Investigation Division who were paid with what was reported as funds from drug seizures to provide security for a youth baseball team that Jordan’s son plays on.

Thursday afternoon before the TV report aired, Jordan said that when the Fayette Bulldogs beat the Georgia Reds at a tournament in Fayetteville last month, one of the Reds' coaches threatened the Fayette team.

“He said something like, ‘We’ll see what happens when you don’t have all these cops around,” Jordan recalled, noting that he didn't personally hear the threat.

The Bulldogs were to face the Reds again in the Tennessee tournament, Jordan explained.

On the TV report, Jordan said he was unaware the two detectives had been paid from the sheriff’s drug fund, which consists of proceeds seized from drug dealers.

Jordan said he wrote a check to pay back the sheriff’s office for the security although he initially thought the American Amateur Baseball Congress which hosted the Tennessee tournament was going to reimburse the sheriff’s department. Jordan said he later learned the AABC would not reimburse the funds.

Although the Fox5 report stated that Jordan didn’t cut his personal check until two days after the TV station sought related records in a written request, Jordan told The Citizen Thursday that he was unaware the open records request had been filed at the time. He added that the check had cleared the bank by the time the Fox5 reporter spoke to him.

“I hadn’t seen it (the open records request) until yesterday,” Jordan said Thursday.

Jordan said the sheriff’s department has sent deputies on security details with school field trips and he didn’t think this situation was any different, particularly because of the reported threats.

The Fox5 report stated that the coach of the Georgia Reds told the station that while he and the team taunted the Fayetteville team, they did not threaten them.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 2:41pm.

Snark I haven't heard from you all day...Are you in hiding?


All Smiles's picture
Submitted by All Smiles on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 5:26am.

Okay, this is all starting to come together now!!! The Georgia Reds, the team which was "taunting" the Fayetteville Bulldogs, the team which Bruce Joran's son played on, has a player whose father was just arrested in Peachtree City, where he lives, this past Friday. Dwight Smith. No insurance, suspended license and cocaine possession. Could Dwight be the one who "tipped off" the media? Sure sounds fishy to me. Hey Dwight and the Georgia Reds, what comes around, goes around.


Submitted by lawaboveall on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 10:44am.

All Smiles,

I am not sure that this is tongue in cheek or not. Is it?
Are you suggesting that someone like Smith "turned in" Jordan?
As unlikely as that seems, so what? Does that excuse what was done?
Does it make what was done any less illegal? Bruce Jordan from all accounts is responsible for what is happening to him. It also appears that this is a pattern of abuse of position that has been going on for much longer than we would like to think. Are you defending this behavior?

Submitted by thebiggun on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:56pm.

I hope everyone knows that when the Sheriff concludes his internal affairs investigation in this matter it becomes an open record under Georgia law. I would encourage everyone to request a copy of this file and read it. You will learn a couple of things of intrest.

First: Which detective or detectives did the investigation. See if they are linked to Jordan in any way. Example (trips taken with him, assigned to IA by him, assigned to the detective office by him etc.) Look at their names and find out if they would have something to lose if they found anything about Jordan in this investigation.

Second: Take a close look at what type of investigation they did. Vehicle he used to go to Tenn. in (County Car of his own car). Gas payments, hotel payments for both him, his family and the detectives he took along. Meals that were paid for and how payment was made. Use of his county phone for any phone calls he made while out of town. If he was on vacation leave or company time while there.

Third: Did the Johnson know he was going and taking his county car and the other detectives ?

Just a few areas that are very important to see if the proper investigation was done. If the answer to any of these questions is yes, then they need to dig much deeper into past behavior that goes back 10 years or more. It is very easy to find you just have to WANT to find it.

Sheriff Johnson there many people that know how a proper internal investigation should be conducted and will making sure you cross your T's and dot your I's on this one. So cover your bases well.

Submitted by tonto707 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:29pm.

the District Attorney has requested that the state Attorney General appoint someone to conduct the investigation, and that is totally proper and should result in an impartial result.

All you blood thirsty dudes will have to wait for the outcome, so posting is now a waste of time.

Submitted by lawaboveall on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 11:02am.

Tonto,

Scott Ballard is smart to let the state handle this. He is so far in bed with the Sheriff that he has no chance of being impartial.
At least he has the intelligence to distance himself from it before he gets caught too.

Aren't you one of those staunch supporters of the sheriff who jumped all over anyone who dared to criticize the FCSO during the recent primary? It was the Dunn and Wells crowd that was telling people that this stuff was going on and that was why the drug monies had to be accounted for with accuracy. You (and Git Real, and bad_ptc and PTC Guy) did not want to hear it. The sheriff could do no wrong. Maxwell and Smith had to be elected because they could get along with the sheriff and that was all that was needed. Now we find out that all of the alleged abuses have basis in fact. So why not keep the debate going here. Are you afraid that it might actually prove those people right? Heaven forbid.

Oh by the way. I heard from a marshal friend that their jobs are safe. Seems that Maxwell and Smith met with Randall and told him they wanted to "roll" the Marshals positions into the Sheriff's department. Randall told them to stuff it!! So much for getting along. You need to seriously re-evaluate your position.

To your credit at least you have not run from this debate like the other people mentioned above. They are suddenly no where to be found. Interesting.

Submitted by 30YearResident on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 3:09pm.

"Seems that Maxwell and Smith met with Randall and told him they wanted to "roll" the Marshals positions into the Sheriff's department. Randall told them to stuff it!! So much for getting along."

I think there's more to this than meets the eye.

First, I believe the criteria for being hired as a County Marshal is much more relaxed than for the Sheriffs Deputies. There are some current County Marshals that just would not qualify.

Second, I don't think that Sheriff Johnson would want to allow the Marshals to be integrated into the ranks and keep their current pay and senority ... that would be a bad move and a slam on the County deputies that would be effected.

If the Marshals were brought in as a sub-set department under the Sheriff, it might make more sense.

Submitted by imaonemanwoman on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:29pm.

Word is Ballard has two of the sheriff's drug-purchased vehicles to drive and the keys to his gas tanks and the Sheriff backed Ballard mightily. There is no way Ballard can look into this one without his own strong ties to the Sheriff coming to light.

Submitted by imjustwondring on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 6:19am.

“Outside” Lawyer from an “Inside” Lawyer?

DA Ballard appoints an outside lawyer? Will the inside lawyer getting an outside lawyer make a difference? Are we going from “Whitewater Bruce” to “Whitewash Ballard” ? Just another one of the “Bruce Perks”……He doles out a brand new car to the DA….Does he have to do that? No--- he has control over the cars and only the favored few get one and only Bruce knows where all these cars and property and money go. This is exactly what Mark Pulliam was trying to at least oversee and regulate when he got the Bruce and Randall one-two. Randall: “At least I didn’t whip him.” Bruce: “You, sir, have earned a night in MY jail.” You are right—Ballard and the whole crowd are beholden to Bruce and will make sure there is a whitewash. Lots of perks around the courthouse crowd by Randall and Bruce (including courtesy taxis, traffic busting speed escorts for Westmoreland, etc). You gotta pay to play. That is why when Randall retires in the middle of a term, the Probate Judge will appoint a ham sandwich (Or Bruce) on Randall’s orders. Why not just cut through that charade and give Randall the appointment? I’m justwondring….

Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:34pm.

Why is it a waste of time to post now? Educating people is a waste of time? Bringing information to light is a waste of time? What is your deal? Are you a Johnson/Jordan lap dog as well?

As for your blood thirsty remark. If wanting justice and wanting what has been covered up for the last twenty years to be known then so be it; blood thirsty we are

Submitted by ihaveone on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:01pm.

Cases that are closed will have no impact on the outcome of Bruce's mistake.

Submitted by ihaveone on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:58pm.

Cases that are closed will have no impact on the outcome of Bruce's mistake.

Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:24pm.

Well maybe fortunatly everything will be up for grabs and fairplay in this one. Due to the DA calling for an investigation into the Department EVERYTHING is game

Submitted by ihaveone on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:34pm.

Do you know if any of the parents of the other kids from this team are commenting? Just curious.

Submitted by auntieemm on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 5:26pm.

This is from the front page of the other Fayette paper this weekend. The article quotes the D.A. as stating he didn't feel it was appropriate for him to look into the matter. It also states that on Friday the D.A. wrote a letter to the Attorney General's office and asked that a special prosecutor be appointed.

THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 5:14pm.

Was the "County Credit Card Used" on this vacation?
For Gas, Food, Anything?
Anyone check this out?


THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 1:20pm.

Federal Bureau of Investigation
REPORT CORRUPTION NOW!
Our New Weblink Makes It Easy
reportcorruption.fbi.gov

05/11/06

Have you stumbled across evidence of dishonesty
in government and don’t know what to do about it?

Then please go straightaway to
reportcorruption.fbi.gov, a new easy-to-remember
web address announced on Thursday by Director
Mueller in a speech in San Diego.

There you will find details on how to share tips
with us—either by phone or through the Internet.
Our analysts will take it from there, reviewing
your information and making sure it is acted on
as quickly as possible.

Why this call for tips? Two reasons:

First, public corruption is the FBI’s highest criminal
priority—because of its potential impact on our
national security (think of a bribe that lets a
terrorist slip across our border or lets drugs flow
into our cities), on our pocketbooks (an estimated
10 percent of government funds is lost to
corruption and fraud every year), and on our way
of life (everything from our trust in government
to whether or not a local school gets built).

Second, many of our cases start with a tip from
someone who encounters corruption. We’re
grateful for every lead we get...and want you to know
where to turn and how to provide
information. For example, when we created a
telephone hotline for corruption tips related to
the rebuilding of areas devastated by Hurricane
Katrina, some 2,500 calls poured in, helping us
launch more than 400 cases.

Want more details on how we’re addressing
public corruption? Then please read the
Director’s full speech. For example, you’ll learn:

Where we’re investigating corruption activities
around the nation;

How many government employees have been
convicted in the past two years;

How some cases have driven positive reform in
government;

How we’re helping other nations address similar
issues with corruption; and

Why fighting corruption, as the Director points
out, “is a mission for which the FBI is singularly
situated.”

On our website, you can also find updated
information on cases, FBI initiatives, and stories,
including the article Cracking Down on Public
Corruption: Why We Take It So Seriously...and
Why It Matters to You.

Resources: National Press Release | Director’s Speech

Federal Bureau of Investigation Us Dept of Justice
2635 Century Pkwy NE
Atlanta, GA 30345
(404) 679-9000
fbi.gov


Submitted by FayetteFirst on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 2:05pm.

Bruce provided security for the Whitewater Creek Country Club from 6PM to 6AM, 7 days a week several years ago.
Cost, to Whitewater Creek Country Club, over $60,000 every year.

The guards, were deputies, in Fayette County Sheriff uniforms and drove Fayette County squad cars.
Cost, doesn't matter the taxpayers paid for them.

Bruce didn't have to leave the County for that one.
This has gone on for years.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 5:46pm.

How those officers earn money when they are off duty isn't our concern.

Whitewater country club paid alot for them.

If you need protection for your business you can call the police or the sheriff's office, and for 30 dollars an hour, you will have all of the protection you need.

As long as you have deep pockets security is never a problem. It is your money you can spend it as you see fit. It is their free time, they can spend it as they see fit.

When they are off duty, they don't cost the taxpayers a dime.

Peachica's picture
Submitted by Peachica on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 12:37pm.

Police officers all of the country work "extra duty" assignments.
The assignments are scheduled thru the police department. From my experience, the officers are paid in cash. A certain portion is their's to keep and a set amount is paid to the police department. All appropriate paperwork must be filed.

This is a perfectly legitimate practice and personally I would want there to be a real police officer where there is a need for security instead of a rent-a-cop armed with a walkie-talkie!
____________________________________________________________________

I'm a spiritual being having earthly experiences


Submitted by IMNSHO on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 10:59pm.

I would guess that most of you do not realize how many of our officers, in the cities and the county, provide security for local businesses. They are not on the taxpayer's dollar when they do it, and the cost to the businesses covers the officers pay and the use of the police vehicles. When these officers are on this "special duty" (again, on their off-time), they are in uniform, and can still make arrests, etc.

What businesses, you ask? Both the movie theaters. The Fayette Bowling Center. The Fayette County Board of Education (for school sports and dances). And the Amphitheater in PTC. Just to name a few.

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 12:04pm.

"The cost to the businesses covers the officers pay and the use of the vehicles"??? Whom do the businesses pay the cash to, please? How is it split up? Who pays the liability insurance, the oil changes, the depriciation? Does any civilian organization take a cut? And a hundred more pertinent questions. Is this procedure covered by any kind of regulation or law?

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:17pm.

I must assume you don't mean this, literally. There are just hundreds of things they COULD do that most of us wouldn't want them to do. We do need to pay them as much as the job is worth however in order to get better people.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:33pm.

I could pay you to accuratley predict the weather. Which is what I want.

There are alot of things you could do in your free time, that I don't want to think about. But what you do in your free time is not my problem.

Cops have been providing off-duty security for years, as muddle has said.

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 12:06pm.

Right. Makes it OK, I assume. No direction, no laws, no rules, no favortism, well managed. Who are you trying to snow?

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:00pm.

I have stories about run-ins that my own kids have had with less than brilliant or virtuous cops. (I've talked about this here before in an earlier post.)

But, generally, their job is indispensible. And the vast majority of them are good people of high integrity concerned to preserve the peace.

I would pay significantly higher taxes--I mean this--if this was required to increase the salary and benefits for our police officers who protect us. The men and women who are doing this often thankless job simply deserve it. Their role in society ought to be valued more highly than it is.

The pay and benefits in Fayette County should reflect the fact that the community highly values an excellent police force.

And the fringe benefit for us is that there would be a sort of "selection pressure" that would help to assure that quality people were on the local force. This would help to weed out the occasional uneducated redneck.

With rising crime in the area, we should start a movement, rallying around our local cops, encouraging and supporting them with a view to excellence in police work.


Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 12:14pm.

I assume you mean over zealous. Not their virtue. We do need to start hiring police officers who are trained as well as an old Canadian Mountie used to be trained, and had the common sense of one. We do have too many who operate "by the book or chief's way." Then weed out the least effective and valuable (including management) and raise the rest's salary by at lest 30%. We wouldn't then need nearly so many, either. For instance, if a mature cop brought my son or daughter home to me personally when they screwed up, instead of a ticket for court all of the time, I assure you I would have much more respect for him and the law. I wouldn't want to see him coming the second time. For that kind of cop I would go to the extreme. I saw it as a young man.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 1:15pm.

Hi, Dopplerobserver.

(By the way, I'd love to know what the name means. Smiling)

It looks as though your question is a result of my own lack of clarity. I intended to suggest that some are "less than virtuous."
(And, of course, this is not to discount the majority who perform their duties in ways that are quite "virtuous.")

Does this make sense?


Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 3:30pm.

There was an inventor named Doppler. He invented the doppler effect. The doppler effect is a way of measurement by the change in sound. Get it?

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 3:43pm.

Thanks.

Actually, I understand the "Doppler effect"--which distinguishes objects moving away from me from objects moving toward me (and plays a major role in confirming the Big Bang theory).

I just wondered why you chose that. Are you a meteorologist, for example?

Smiling

----

The Surfer: That was me in '73!


muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 6:12am.

Lest this thread turn into a discussion about my kids and my parenting skills, I would like to redirect it to the important point:

Fayette County cops should be compensated with highly competitive salary and benefits so that *this* is the coveted place to work if you are in law enforcement. This puts local agencies in a position to hire only the best, highly-trained and professional college-educated men and women. And it entitles citizens to demand the highest integrity in local officers.

Violent crime *is* on the rise here. We need more cops, and they need to be the best there are. And if this entails an increase in taxes, I'll be the first to plunk down my change.


Submitted by tonto707 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:32pm.

are having run ins with the cops, are we to assume your kids are a chip off the old block?

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 5:50am.

Well, first, perhaps you didn't notice, but my post was in support of law enforcement.

And one or two posts up I had another one, reporting that I grew up in the home of a cop.

I began as I did, speaking of the "run-in" to offset a post and ensuing discussion I had some time ago that people might remember.

You seem to have a mindset such that, by definition, the cop is always right. But this was a bad cop who needed to go down before he hurt someone. Fortunately, he was taken down as a result of the "run-in" with my boys.

This was a situation in which a cop was belligerent from the beginning of a traffic stop for speeding. The whole episode is a long--and old--story, which I've shared in detail here.

But he wound up arresting both of my sons for "obstruction." The charge against the younger son was immediately dropped. My older son went to court. It never made it to a jury. The judge dismissed the case. Further, the cop was fired for what he did (falsified his report, ditched the video from the cruiser, pepper-sprayed my older son and even got my younger son's 6-month-old baby (in the back seat of his car) with some of the overspray. And this incident was not the first in which he had mishandled things and attempted to "manhandle" a citizen.

What I really love about the story is that, after he was fired from this podunk police force (a small town near here) he went to another one a couple of towns away. He worked there for a few months until he was pulled over while off duty in Henry County and arrested for a DUI. The Henry County cop's cruiser caught him giving the cop a *very* hard time and bragging that he would get the charge dropped because he knows how to manipulate the courts.

He is now banned from law enforcement in the state of Georgia.

And, yes, my sons are both chips off the old block, Tonto. I'm very, very proud of both of these fine, young men.


Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:36pm.

Do you have anything useful to add to these discussions tonto or are you really that ignorant

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:45pm.

Muddle are you one of those parents whose kids do no wrong? Tell me you are not one of those, pleeaaase....

Usually when parents say their kid had a run in with cops, it screams to others that their kid did something wrong.
I know as a parent that is hard to accept.

Part of supporting our cops, is accepting their judgemnt when they bring your kid home to you.

There is a group of parents in my neighborhood who for years have lived in denial, and claimed that their boys are good kids. Their "good kids" have now "graduated" to breaking and entering and arson. Not good at all.
Tell me you are not like them muddle.
I have you on a pedestal. Especially since you are a madtown alum.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 5:55am.

Absolutely not. You might have gleaned from some of my posts that I teach ethics (among other things). And I have always tried to "bring my work home."

Please read my reply to Tonto.

I'm inclined to think that Tonto is one of those who thinks that a cop can do no wrong.


Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:51pm.

the comment tonto made was

"If your kids are having run ins with the cops, are we to assume your kids are a chip off the old block?"

Chip off the old block isn't useful. Nothing more than a cheap undeserved shot at muddle.

If muddles kids did something then they did something. I'm sure muddle handled it in only the way muddle can.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:58pm.

I took his comment as a good natured jab. The kind most of us throw here.

I didn't realize he was being mean.

I love muddle, but he is from "madtown" Those kids were pretty wild in the day. I am from Wisconsin, and still remember.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 6:01am.

Fortunately, by the time I reached Madison, I was already a family man and there for a Ph.D. I never ventured into the frat houses.

But Madison could make "Animal House" look tame. John Belushi would come off as Mr. Rogers in that environment. UW-Madison has consistently been voted best party campus in the U.S. News.

I also like Garrison Keillor's comment when he came there to do a "Prairie Home COmpanion" show: "Madison is the only place I know of where there are groups advocating the rights of lesbian whales."

That's not too far off.

And a former Wisconsin governor once quipped that Madison was "54 square miles surrounded by reality."

(Here's the real mystery: How does someone survive a Ph.D. program in the Madison philosophy department and come through with even deeper Christian convictions and politically conservative views?)


Submitted by skyspy on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 6:51am.

I guess if it doesn't kill you, it makes you stronger.

Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:21pm.

Understood skyspy since you are a good natured person as well from what I've seen. Me on the other hand am not as good natured and can pick out the cheap shots. Keep your good nature skyspy Smiling

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:13pm.

We need them more than they need us. We do need to support all of our local deputies and police. They are the only thing standing between us and Clayton county.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:21pm.

They have a skill that more of us need. We need to be protected.

We need to pay them what they are worth so they can live on it.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:21pm.

You kill me sometimes. You have no idea how hard these guys work do you?

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:14pm.

You didn't quite cover all of the details. Does the cop get paid the full amount? Is he allowed to use county vehicles? Just how is the money and equipment accounted for? Is it like the Church and school duty? If they work all night can they work for the county the next day?

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:18pm.

It is their day off. The 30 bucks is just a guess. Just like fireman work extra on their days off also. They do painting, carpenter work, yardwork etc.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:05pm.

My Dad, a career cop, did this sort of thing for years.

Because it pulled him away from his family, he often took me (his only child) along. I have great memories of cruising the grounds of expensive golf communities or codos with him. He would work all night on the pier in Pompano Beach, Florida, and I would stay out with him.

It was extra money for the family and, as you note, it does not cost taxpayers a dime.


Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 6:10pm.

It's a shame that they have to do it. We don't pay them enough for putting their lives on the line for us everyday.

Submitted by snitch on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:49pm.

Oh yeah, Beverly Watson worked there too, you know, the lady that was murdered!

Submitted by thebiggun on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:59pm.

Did Jordan and Watson know one another before he headed the murder investigation into her murder? If so, I don't ever remember that being said before. If they did, what was their relationship ?

VERY INTERESTING

Submitted by snitch on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 9:12am.

The answer to your question "biggun" is yes.

Submitted by outsider on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:00am.

The more objective postings suggest that most people are upset with the fact that Bruce took officers with him to protect the ball team from what he perceived as a threat. That is the only thing Bruce has admitted to and, in this country, one is presumed innocent until the evidence has all been presented. So if Bruce has denied knowledge of drug money being used to pay for this trip, as US citizens we owe it to Bruce to assume his innocence unless the evidence proves otherwise. I would like to suggest that we hold off on judgment until the investigation is completed.
One of the postings said “God is in control.” I was glad to see the reference to God. We should all seek His advice and counsel. God is all knowing. What you may not have considered is that God also considers it a sin to devise a scheme to persecute someone. See Proverbs 6:12-19 for the things God hates.
“ 12 A scoundrel and villain,
who goes about with a corrupt mouth,
13 who winks with his eye,
signals with his feet
and motions with his fingers,
14 who plots evil with deceit in his heart—
he always stirs up dissension.
15 Therefore disaster will overtake him in an instant;
he will suddenly be destroyed—without remedy.
16 There are six things the LORD hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies
and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.
See also Leviticus 19:18 “" 'Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD.” Perhaps we should trust this matter to God and make sure that what we are doing with these posts is not more abominable in God’s eyes than the things of which Bruce is accused. I don’t expect this message to mean much to people who have not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, but I do expect it to be a word of caution to those people who consider themselves Christians. Jesus said in John 14:23, “Jesus replied, ‘If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.’” He has commanded us not to slander, not to gossip and not to create wicked schemes. I will end this with a prayer for Bruce and his family and for you, the readers and authors of these posts, that God will bring good from what Satan meant for harm. And, I will pray for us all to seek God instead of leaning on own understanding. God will judge Bruce but He will also judge you and me.

Submitted by faithful spouse on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 5:26pm.

Yes, you are right God is in control. I have known of things that Bruce has done for years to others and to my family personally. I have had to sit back and let God be in control of the situation because if it were up to me personally , Bruce would have had to answer for what all he did to us and so many more. So for years , I have had to pray and leave it in his hands, which has been so hard to do but I know what is right.My biggest obstacle in the Bruce and his followers situations was praying for patience because I wanted them to be accountable then, but it has taken years for any truth of him to come out. God does make people accountable for their actions , it may be sooner or later. There are consequences for all that we do. Yes, we are all sinners and that is why God allowed Jesus to die on the cross so that we could be forgiven for our sins. But that doesn't mean that it is ok to keep abusing others all the time which Bruce is so faithful to do. I do as God commands, pray for my enemies and I have prayed for Bruce and his followers . I know that God can use this for something good but Bruce also has to be accountable for all the wrongs that he does and I am praying that the truth will come out. Just don't be so nieve. It's not that people are devising schemes to persecute Bruce, they are just telling the truth which has been so hard to do because Bruce does such a good job in covering up all the bad that he does. This is finally a point where the public finally is able to hear and listen to things he has done to others in the past. So many have been in fear of their lives and their family's lives to ever speak up before, but now since he is in the spot light , he can't really do much to them now.

sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 11:35pm.

I figured since Dunn is the hero now maybe he can run for sheriff..
Randall will retire and Dunn will make sure Bruce is gone so that way he would have direct access to the cookie jar. That's what he's wanted all along. He never could win in court to gain access of the money and he lost the election so i'm sure this isn't the last we've heard of Dunn..I just have that feeling that there is a plan brewing..


THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 1:02pm.

You are throwing stones again.
You just can't get off Dunn.
Don't you have a kitchen to clean,
or some shopping you need to do?
If not, I understand. Do What you have to do.

Have a nine day!


sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 1:19pm.

Sorry to keep throwing stones but that is one guy that just crawls up my spine! I cant be at home cleaning or out shopping because i'm at work. Some of us do have to work ya know.


Submitted by lawaboveall on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:27am.

Sweetpea you really need to give it up. You cannot blame this on Greg Dunn. He did not have anything to do with the misuse of funds.
That was Bruce, period, end of story. You can try to deflect the blame for this from your friend (husband, employer, former whatever,)but it simply will not work. Despite all the claims you make, Dunn and the Commission only wanted accountability. Seems to me that they were right in realizing that some wrongdoing was going on here. I wonder how many people would like an election "do over"

Submitted by snark on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:39am.

is not what she pretends to be.

sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:44am.

Who am I pretending to be?


Submitted by lawaboveall on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 9:44am.

Are you suggesting that sweetpea is someone who is out to get your brother?

nuk's picture
Submitted by nuk on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 1:58pm.

Is the answer "who is Jim Watson's daughter?"

NUK


sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 2:07pm.

Who the heck is Jim Watson?


nuk's picture
Submitted by nuk on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 2:21pm.

Never mind. I guess he wasn't on Oprah or other major TV news events.

NUK


sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 2:47pm.

Still never heard of him but then again I work so I dont get to watch alot of TV during the day like some folks do.


kimberlyinptc's picture
Submitted by kimberlyinptc on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 3:43pm.

If there's ever anything you don't know...try 'googling' it. Anyway...Jim Watson was found guilty and sentenced for killing his wife. He was a one time Riverdale cop...the daughter sided with her father and last I heard ran his business here in Fayette while he's busy trying not to drop the soap in jail. Jordan played a big part in the case...at least he was on the news every night talking about it.


Submitted by FayetteFirst on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 3:57pm.

Google

youtube lynn westmoreland

You and 150,000 other people will see it.

sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 3:49pm.

Okay, now I know.. He killed Beverly Watson. I knew her name I just couldn't remember his..Yes, that is the guy that followed Bruce and his family around for a while stalking them.


THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:03pm.

Need to be careful what you go digging up.
Sometimes skeltons are better left alone.
I know there are people that know more about
this than you do. Walk away... Leave it.

You seem to like sitting on the edge.

Again, Have A Nice Day!


Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:27pm.

Leave sweetpea8870 alone Boss! She is asking questions about things that she is either unfamiliar with or can't remember at the time. That is called "learning". Get familiar with it Boss. Everyone will be learning a lot in the next few weeks about this matter.

It also seems in my opinion that you would like the Watson case left out of this. Any particular reason?

THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 7:57pm.

There is nothing I would like more is for a lot more of this to come
out. But there is a right way to do this and a wrong way. Some things
should only be told to the feds, they call it surprise, you know what I mean. I have a lot more at stake here than a lot of you. I was under this ????/?/// for about //.;/ years. There are too many, many, good people at the SO. But there are also a lot of good people that have been run off or out of state. It has to come to an end NOW.
And if you know anything it's not just "BRUCE", as I said before, there is the click, the hatchet guys, the do the dirty deads, and get rewards and favors. Remember "QUILTY BY ASSOCIATION". CALL THE FEDS I HAVE POSTED IT TWICE. SORRY ITS UP TO YOU AND THE PEOPLE.
God Bless
Remember - "UNITED WE STAND - DIVIDED WE FALL"


Submitted by bobby1378 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:28pm.

I understand your stance on the matter. However I if I am reading it right and understanding you on this; you were involved in some way shape or form, and please don't misunderstand me on this. I don't think you were involved in anything illegal. But you know more than you are saying and seems like you will not say at all.
Your quote: CALL THE FEDS I HAVE POSTED IT TWICE. SORRY ITS UP TO YOU AND THE PEOPLE.
Makes me think you will not do as you are telling us to do.
Am I wrong in this?

Submitted by dopplerobserver on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 11:47am.

He wants help in a payback. If there are FACTS, nothing else, OK, but if not, forget it.

THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 8:50pm.

You all need to do what you need to do.
I have done all I can do. Like I keep Saying.
"U N I T E D W E S T A N D, D I V I D E D W E F A L L"
Belive me, I have been to them. It feels good.
As I said you do what you need to do. But the blogs they are just
a way some of you to vent, go home and drink a beer.
This is serious, we may never get a chance like this again.
You have to go to, or make a call or send an email.
No one is having trouble taking cheap shots here, but this does not
remedy the problem at hand.


sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:14pm.

And the last time I checked I wasn't having a conversation with you!
I didn't want to then and I dont want to now!!


sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:09pm.

I know alot more than you think and by the way, I know who I would like to bury...


THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 4:37pm.

I have watched you and your friends play
word games all afternoon "THE WATSON CASE".

You don't play well with others I see...
From Your Remarks, You Must Have A Very Long List.

I Think You Had A Bad Day At Work Today.

Go Home, Have A Nice Evening!


Submitted by truth hurts on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 12:06am.

I’m not a supporter of Dunn but if he is the only candidate, so be it. The problem I have with Dunn is he is power hungry. Dunn wanted law enforcement control by making the Marshals the law enforcement entity of the county, making the Sheriff a jailer. I don’t like that one bit. I would rather vote every 4 years on one person, the Sheriff, to control what is going on in the community. One man, the Sheriff, having to deal with the voters every election. Not voting on 6 different people over a dozen years to control the law. (The county commission) Besides, they have other things to do than run law enforcement. And who says they know how to run law enforcement in the first place. Find one man and elect him. If he doesn’t do the right job (and he knows this) vote in the next guy.

Submitted by truth hurts on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 12:23am.

If thats what it takes to get Bruce out of there, I am all for it!

THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 11:19pm.

The I Team contact...
dale.russell@foxtv.com


Submitted by bronson on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:47pm.

The I-Team isn't finished there's more to tell. If you've worked for the Sheriff and have something to ad now is the time. Here's the email to send things - iteamatlanta@foxtv.com. Dale Russell is the name of the investigator investigating Bruce and other problems. You won't be the only one a lot of others who have been Brucified are coming forward.

Submitted by angelas eyes on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:56pm.

Bronson, please update with email address. I went to the site you have posted and it went to the sports page.

Submitted by tsk tsk on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 10:02pm.

iteamatlanta@foxtv.com

Bronson, please update with email address. I went to the site you have posted and it went to the sports page.

whacked Smiling

Submitted by nneed4justice on Mon, 09/11/2006 - 12:58pm.

This is the e-mail address to send the I-Team any information on the subject. If you want to go to their website and view the news stories by Dale Russell, go to myfoxatlanta.com.

Submitted by imaonemanwoman on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:28pm.

“Johnson said he hoped the investigation would be wrapped up by Tuesday or Wednesday and he will elaborate further once the investigation is concluded.”
---How can you set a date for the end of an internal investigation? Why is it internal? It involves misuse of manpower, misuse of drug money, misuse of power, bad supervision, and the list could go on. There must be an outside investigation.

“The investigative report on Fox5 Atlanta focused on two detectives in Jordan's Criminal Investigation Division who were paid with what was reported as funds from drug seizures to provide security for a youth baseball team that Jordan’s son plays on.”
---No, the investigation focused on Bruce Jordan. The newspaper seems to and Jordan wants to try and make it focus on anything but Jordan.

““He said something like, ‘We’ll see what happens when you don’t have all these cops around,” Jordan recalled, noting that he didn't personally hear the threat.”
---He pulled two deputies off duty to go with him for a five day trip and he doesn’t know what was said? He acted on hearsay? Why didn’t he call the cops in Tennessee instead of dragging along and paying two people who worded for him?

“Jordan said he was unaware the two detectives had been paid from the sheriff’s drug fund, which consists of proceeds seized from drug dealers.”
---He controls the drug money and he didn’t know where the check came from? If that is true then he doesn’t deserve the responsibility of keeping up with the funds. He’s one of the “top cops” and he doesn’t know about the money he’s responsible for monitoring for the federal government?

“Jordan told The Citizen Thursday that he was unaware the open records request had been filed at the time.”
---Is anyone out there buying that someone in control, 2nd in command, wasn’t told a television station had an open records request in?

““I hadn’t seen it (the open records request) until yesterday,” Jordan said Thursday.”
---That might be true, he might not have actually seen the request itself but there is no way he didn’t know about it.

The Sheriff isn't going to be able to fix this one for Bruce Almighty (no longer).

THE BOSS's picture
Submitted by THE BOSS on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:14pm.

Federal Bureau of Investigation
REPORT CORRUPTION NOW!
Our New Weblink Makes It Easy
reportcorruption.fbi.gov

05/11/06

Have you stumbled across evidence of dishonesty in government and don’t know what to do about it?

Then please go straightaway to reportcorruption.fbi.gov, a new easy-to-remember web address announced on Thursday by Director Mueller in a speech in San Diego.

There you will find details on how to share tips with us—either by phone or through the Internet. Our analysts will take it from there, reviewing your information and making sure it is acted on as quickly as possible.

Why this call for tips? Two reasons:

First, public corruption is the FBI’s highest criminal priority—because of its potential impact on our national security (think of a bribe that lets a terrorist slip across our border or lets drugs flow into our cities), on our pocketbooks (an estimated 10 percent of government funds is lost to corruption and fraud every year), and on our way of life (everything from our trust in government to whether or not a local school gets built).

Second, many of our cases start with a tip from someone who encounters corruption. We’re grateful for every lead we get...and want you to know where to turn and how to provide information. For example, when we created a telephone hotline for corruption tips related to the rebuilding of areas devastated by Hurricane Katrina, some 2,500 calls poured in, helping us launch more than 400 cases.

Want more details on how we’re addressing public corruption? Then please read the
Director’s full speech. For example, you’ll learn:

Where we’re investigating corruption activities around the nation;

How many government employees have been convicted in the past two years;

How some cases have driven positive reform in government;

How we’re helping other nations address similar issues with corruption; and

Why fighting corruption, as the Director points out, “is a mission for which the FBI is singularly situated.”

On our website, you can also find updated information on cases, FBI initiatives, and stories, including the article Cracking Down on Public Corruption: Why We Take It So Seriously...and Why It Matters to You.

Resources: National Press Release | Director’s Speech

Federal Bureau of Investigation Us Dept of Justice
2635 Century Pkwy NE
Atlanta, GA 30345
(404) 679-9000
fbi.gov


Submitted by tsk tsk on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:51pm.

I would pay money to see the FBI agent's face when he gets that call.

Submitted by truth hurts on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 11:17pm.

Yea, Me too. I bet Bruce would also like a picture, but he would take the money out of the Federal Drug account

Submitted by angelas eyes on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 9:59pm.

Why???? Are the FBI involved with the good ol' boy network too? I would much rather see the look on Bruce Jordan's face when he got the call or visit from the FBI.

Submitted by tsk tsk on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 10:06pm.

You should step away from the kool aid Smiling

Submitted by faithful spouse on Sun, 09/10/2006 - 5:34pm.

I don't wan't to show enjoyment when someone is going through something like Bruce is. But it does feel extremely good that the truth is FINALLY being brought out in the open. So many have absolutely no idea what really goes on in the Sheriff's Dept underneath Bruce's control. It's very sad that the Sheriff's Dept as a whole get's a bad name when it is Bruce and the INNER RING underneath him that gives the bad name because they are the one's that are so corrupt. It phathom's me to think and know the kind of things that go on in that inner ring actually is a part of Fayette County. You could actually turn all that happens there into a book or movie: The missing drug money, where and on whom it is actually spent,

----------------------------

EDITED and warned

Your allegations (or rumor) are way out of line.

Cal the censor

-----------------------------
I've seen SO MANY BAD THINGS happen to such good people there,and who surrounds all of the bad things that happen to these people? Great guess.....BRUCE. He is such a power hungry man and IT WILL go his way or else.........Everyone is so scared of him and afraid to go against him, because of what he is capable of doing. I've seen it personally. It is OK to go against him especially when you are right, which is usually the case if he is going against you. Maybe in the past he could really punnish you but hopefully this is the begining where he can't do that anymore. Speak up if you know something, most everyone in the Sheriff's Dept. knows something of his corruption. It is time that he start answering to the corrupt things that he does. I've wanted for such a long time to see him be brought down, but my spouse tells me over and over that it will come some day. Evil can't be on top forever. Well, hopefully this is just the begining of the FALL OF BRUCE AND ANY ONE ASSOCIATED WITH HIM. I just hope that the ones that do work under him think about your families and cherish them and start talking now and get away from his control before you are brought down with him. If it is not now , it will happen at some point because as I said before, evil can't stay on top forever. God is in control and he will prevail. The one's in these other comments that are PRO Bruce, you must have been delusioned by him as he is very good of doing or are a part of the inner circle and afraid of all of the good things that he has provided for so long to you might just suddenly stop if it all comes out. I just hope that it is that he has delusioned you and not the latter. As I said in the begining , I don't take enjoyment in seeing bad things happen to people, but it is good to see THE TRUTH FINALLY COMING OUT. It is time for the BAD to be taken out of the Sheriff's DEPT, and not let Bruce make all of the GOOD PEOPLE leave as he has done so much. Don't get me wrong, the majority of the Sheriff's Dept. is a very proactive group and take their oath to heart.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.