-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
You say ‘detention,’ I say ‘retention’ . . .Tue, 02/20/2007 - 4:58pm
By: Letters to the ...
Re today’s front page article about the BoE selling or keeping 33 acres: ”If the property were sold, the school system would have to build new detention ponds, since the current ones....” [Editor’s note: I have no excuse for our error about the great Paris art museum. But I must demur to your Webster’s definition on types of ponds. From the U.S. Department of Energy’s website, the following: “A retention pond is designed to hold a specific amount of water indefinitely. Usually the pond is designed to have drainage leading to another location when the water level gets above the pond capacity, but still maintains a certain capacity. A detention pond is a low lying area that is designed to temporarily hold a set amount of water while slowly draining to another location. They are more or less around for flood control when large amounts of rain could cause flash flooding if not dealt with properly.” |