|
||
Wednesday, July 28, 2004
|
||
Bad
Links? |
Confronting some assumptionsBy Dr. WARREN THROCKMORTON Chris Matthews, the tough but affable host of MSNBCs Hardball, advanced an interesting argument in favor of same sex marriage. His theory is that the government has a kind of obligation to encourage bonding among homosexuals. On a July 12 show with Utah Senator Orin Hatch, Mr. Matthews asked the following question of Sen. Hatch: Senator, how do you discourage promiscuity, sexual promiscuity, among gay people if you dont encourage bonding of some kind? As I understand his question, Mr. Matthews makes two moral assumptions: One, promiscuity among homosexuals is bad and two, such behavior can be discouraged by government policy concerning marriage. To me, that line of thinking could be insulting to those who identify as gay. The reasoning seems to go like this: These poor helpless gay people are at the mercy of their sexual drives and they cannot avoid jumping in and out of each others beds without the government providing some controls. This seems to demean the moral free agency of those who identify as gay. I think an additional unspoken assumption is that the reason straight people are not promiscuous is because legal marriage is between a man and a woman. I may be stretching here a bit but I dont think that is how it works for most straight people. Even unmarried straight people frown on cheating. I cannot imagine a guy surviving after this revelation to his girlfriend: Honey, I slept with her but since you and I arent married, I didnt think you would mind. Or You know, sweetie, without the civilizing impact of marriage, I just couldnt help but jump into bed with your friend. I know of no one who has resisted the urge to stray due to Social Security benefits. Certainly not all gay people cheat, but a recent survey found infidelity in about 62 percent of all gay couples, leading the researchers in the Journal of Family Psychology to write: The practice of sexual non-monogamy among some gay couples is one variable that differentiates gay and heterosexual couples. From his question to Sen. Hatch, one could assume Mr. Matthews agrees that homosexuals are generally promiscuous but that this behavior can be shaped via government policy concerning marriage. However, Mr. Hardball then throws a curve. He asked Sen. Hatch this question: What do you think we should do as a country of ours where you have the right to pursue happiness with people who are of the same sex who find themselves born with an orientation towards homosexuality or the gay lifestyle? What should they do with their lives? So people are born gay? Talk show host Matthews, doubling as a biological determinist, apes the flawed conventional wisdom that sexual behavior and attractions are inborn and irresistible. By his question, he suggests the gay lifestyle is involuntary. I wonder if he believes promiscuous straights are likewise destined for such shenanigans. If lifestyle and behavior are determined by genes, then why in the world would legal recognition of same-sex marriage solve the gay promiscuity problem? Wont people just keep fornicating in tune with their genetic predilections? You really cant have it both ways. If such an orientation with the excesses assumed by Mr. Matthews is truly hard-wired as a matter of genetic obligation, then how can any government policy shape the behavior? Talk show hosts and others who traffic in sound bites are not often bothered by such conundrums. The truth is, in a free society we are responsible for our behavior and the genes made me do it argument is a loser. If the gay lifestyle is as promiscuous as Mr. Matthews seems to assume, then surely the responsibility for this is with each individual who determines where and with whom to be passionate. Gay, straight or in between, we are responsible for what we do. No matter how hard you pitch the idea, neither genes nor an absence of government-encouraged bonding are responsible for ones lifestyle choices. [Warren Throckmorton is director of college counseling and an associate professor of psychology at Grove City (Penn.) College. His research, Initial Empirical and Clinical Findings Concerning the Change Process for Ex-Gays, was published in the June 2002 issue of the American Psychological Associations publication Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Learn about the documentary I Do Exist at www.idoexist.net.] |
|
Copyright
2004-Fayette Publishing, Inc.
|