Wednesday, June 5, 2002

Story biased against Watson

I believe this report regarding the proceedings in the Watson matter was biased and prejudicial against Jim Watson. Further, I fail to see how Mr. Watson's prior occupations would enable him to hide a body where it would never be found. At any rate, her remains were found, so maybe he didn't do it after all.

This man is innocent until proven guilty. It was good to see that you did report about the ineptness of the Sheriff's office and the "loss" of the tape, though, so the report was not totally anti-Jim Watson.

Regina Riddle

GinaR789@aol.com

What do you think of this story?
Click here to send a message to the editor.


Back to Opinion Home Page | Back to the top of the page