PTC City Attorneys
sue Citizen for libel By MONROE ROARK
mroark@thecitizennews.com
The Citizen's
publisher and parent company and a Planterra
Ridge resident have been targeted in a libel
lawsuit filed by the law firm that represents
Peachtree City.
Rick Lindsey of
Webb, Stuckey and Lindsey announced during
Thursday night's City Council meeting that his
firm had filed a libel suit earlier that day in
Fayette County Superior Court on behalf of senior
partner James Webb against local resident Stephen
Brown, Citizen editor-publisher Cal Beverly and
Fayette Publishing Inc.
This has got
to stop, Lindsey said, referring to
additional letters from this same small
group of authors that again implied some
wrongdoing.
Someone has
to bring a halt to this type of inappropriate
journalism and the slurring of people with
excellent reputations, Lindsey told the
council and about 50 members of the public at the
meeting.
We believe
their action is an attack on not only this
newspaper's fundamental First Amendment rights,
but on the very right of private individuals to
comment on matters involving their
government, publisher Cal Beverly wrote in
an editorial on Page 4A of this issue.
We believe
that this powerful and well-connected law firm is
trying to shut off the voice of dissent and
debate in this community, the editorial
said.
The suit stems from
two letters in the Citizen's editorial pages over
the past three months, in which Brown raised
questions concerning Webb taking a position on
the board of directors of a new local bank in
which he is an investor while simultaneously
defending the city against a lawsuit filed by one
of his fellow bank organizers and directors.
The Bank of
Georgia's 12-member board includes Pathway
Communities president Steve Black and local
builder Mike Rossetti, both of whom have recently
been involved in litigation against the city.
Pathway has a suit pending that challenges the
constitutionality of the city's new traffic
impact ordinance, a pivotal element of the recent
Home Depot issue on the city's west side.
Brown's two letters
were published in The Citizen shortly after the
city announced that it would accept new bids for
city attorney services, which Webb, Stuckey and
Lindsey have provided since 1992. Bids were
accepted in December, after which city staff
recommended the appointment of the Newnan firm of
Glover and Davis, but the inclusion of the city
solicitor's position caused Councilman Robert
Brooks to ask that those bids be discarded and a
new round of bidding instigated.
After a second bid,
the staff changed its position and recommended
Webb, Stuckey and Lindsey to be kept as city
attorney and solicitor, but the vote was delayed
until last week's meeting.
Lindsey spoke to
the council at length about Webb's position with
The Bank of Georgia and what he called
inaccurate, outrageous
and clearly libelous statements in
the newspaper. His complete statement appears on
Page 10A.
Brown, sitting in
the audience during Lindsey's statement, asked
for permission to reply. Mayor Bob lenox refused,
saying, This is my meeting and I'll run it
the way I want to.
Councilman Dan
Tennant objected but was voted down, 4-1, when he
asked for time to allow Brown to reply to
Lindsey's charges.
What we
witnessed was not only a gross and sickening
travesty of justice, but it was downright
frightening, Tennant wrote in a letter to
the editor on Page 4A. On the one hand, we
have the city attorney filing a lawsuit against a
citizen of our community for libel, even though
the so-called libel took form in letters to the
editor of a local newspaper, based upon what I
believe were well thought out and well documented
opinions.
Then we have
the mayor refusing to allow this same citizen,
Steve Brown, to be heard in his own defense
immediately after Mr. Brown was verbally
reprimanded by the city attorney, Tennant
wrote. I am not sure which issue is more
outrageous or more scary.
Lindsey said after
Webb was asked to sit on the bank's board, his
firm consulted state ethics codes and asked the
state bar for an opinion, which Lindsey said
would not be available for a year or two. The
American Bar Association in Chicago also was
contacted, as well as an ethics and journalism
professor at the University of Georgia, Lindsey
added. They were asked about the ethical issue of
an attorney participating as a bank board member,
Lindsey said.
There is
absolutely no conflict between Mr. Webb's
involvement with the Bank of Georgia and our firm
representing the city of Peachtree City, he
said.
As for the letters,
which Lindsey said began appearing even before
the bank opened, he addressed what he said was an
insinuation that the firm has been improperly
involved with Pathway.
Let me state
that we have not represented Pathway or PCDC in
the entire time we have been attorneys for
Peachtree City, said Lindsey. To my
knowledge, none of our present clients has a
claim adverse to Peachtree City which would
require our firm to either disqualify itself from
representing both parties or would require our
firm to receive a written consent from such
parties. Also, to my knowledge, none of the
attorneys at Webb, Stuckey and Lindsey, LLC, has
a financial interest which would be adverse to
the city of Peachtree City.
While billing the
city at less than its normal hourly rate, the
firm has received slightly more than $100,000
from the city for the last three years, an amount
that Lindsey pointed out is less than 1/30 of the
firm's total revenue. Of that, $25,000 is given
back to the city each year to the city's
Development Authority through the firm's
sponsorship of the Frederick Brown Jr.
Amphitheater Summer Concert Series.
We have not
reaped some huge financial reward in representing
the city, said Lindsey. The
implication that we have `gotten rich' off of the
city is simply false and ludicrous.
Faced with a choice
between withdrawing its application for city
attorney and fighting the charges leveled in the
newspaper, Lindsey said the firm could no
longer stand idly by while these
allegations were printed. This has got to
stop, he said.
While the libel
case is litigated, Webb will voluntarily remove
himself from all city business. Lindsey and
Stephen Ott have handled most of the city
business over the past few years anyway, Lindsey
said, adding that this decision is an unfortunate
one for the city.
Any money received
by the firm as a result of the litigation will be
given to local charities, Lindsey said.
This litigation will be lengthy and
expensive, he added. However, we are
prepared to fight, and fight we will.
A vote on the city
attorney position was tabled until a separate
ethics charge against Webb is considered (see
separate story in this edition).
|