Recession OVER! Jobs Growth Explode! Pay increases by 40%!

S. Lindsey's picture

Where is all this happening?

The Federal Government that’s where.

“Federal employees making salaries of $100,000 or more jumped from 14% to 19% of civil servants during the recession's first 18 months — and that's before overtime pay and bonuses are counted.

Federal workers are enjoying an extraordinary boom time — in pay and hiring — during a recession that has cost 7.3 million jobs in the private sector.

The highest-paid federal employees are doing best of all on salary increases. Defense Department civilian employees earning $150,000 or more increased from 1,868 in December 2007 to 10,100 in June 2009, the most recent figure available.

When the recession started, the Transportation Department had only one person earning a salary of $170,000 or more. Eighteen months later, 1,690 employees had salaries above $170,000.”(USA Today)
(Another SF Factious Site)

While the MSM carries the water for the Administration and vilifies Wall Street and Bankers over Bonuses the Government quietly insures the undying loyalty to its minions by buying them.

The private sector average salary is $40,000. The Governments Average salary is $70,000. What does the Government produce? What goods do they deliver to the Citizens?

Well many feel nothing but Red Tape and Bureaucracy.

This Tax and Spend, Spend and Spend Government look after only itself and the Power and Control it can exert.

While 7.5 MILLION formally Tax Paying Citizens are unemployed the one thing the Government takes care of is... itself.

S. Lindsey's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by AtHomeGym on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 3:14pm.

I do not mind disclosing the fact that a. I was a federal employee for 42 yrs (21 yrs active Army, 21 yrs Army Civil Servant) and b. when I eretired in 2001, my salary was $96,000 a yr. I was a Sr level supervisor, authorized 22 employees. Of course I always paid federal & state taxes on my income. So what? I suspect that someone in the private sector with my responsibilities and authority was getting paid more, but I can't verify that. Hey, don't knock it, if you want some of it and are willing to take the heat that comes with the job, go for it!

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 9:27pm.

but during a Recession/Depression.. With 7.5 Million out of work.. another 450,000 jobs lost just last week alone, don't cha think the Government needs to "FEEL OUR PAIN" just a little..

Defense Dept increased their $150K+ jobs by 8232 in 18 MONTHS.

The DOT had just ONE employee making over $170k. 18 MONTHS later and BAM.. 1690 now make over $170k..

Like I said in the good times rock and roll.... get it while you can.. but when this economy is shedding jobs at a rate of 450,000+ per WEEK.. and the Government has the stones to go after Private businesses because their people make too much is well HYPOCRITICAL at best.

"A little matter will move a party

but it must be something great that moves a nation.

~Thomas Paine"


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 2:27pm.

Just made a quick check of current Fed Pay Chart and if I was still working, I'd be making $128,000 and change--that means the salary has increased more than $32,000 in 8 1/2 yrs!

Submitted by normal on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 3:52pm.

Ok, The United States of Mexico is Broke, No money, How in the hell can they give pay and benefit increases to anyone. This crap is going to come to a tragic halt one day. I simply cant understand the spending by the Jack ass group in the government. We are Broke, What does it take for everyone to understand this. We should rent out rooms in white house instead of wasting all that space. Vote out anyone in office at the time of the next election. Thats everyone even our lovely president. Merry Christmas to all

Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:17pm.

FBI, CIA , NTSB , ATC A few of us take our jobs seriously. So far they haven't found a computer that can do my job.

Merry Christmas normal. obumbles has already said no cost of living raise for federal employees, only the white collar criminals we elect will get raises this year.

suggarfoot's picture
Submitted by suggarfoot on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:54pm.

and Air traffic controllers got screwed so bad many years ago, I don't now if they will ever catch up.

As for the pencil pushers, I've had some that make you beat your head against the wall. I think there is a lot of hiring your buddy going on, cause some of the rank and file can't walk and chew gum at the same time. That is a fact, yet they pull down salaries that are ridiculous for what they don't do.


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 8:55am.

PATCO was led by self-serving idiots that couldn't understand the simple fact of law that they couldn't go on strike and had agreed to that. Why they were shocked that Reagan didn't intervene is just how deluded these folks were.

Those were scary times for pilots with a whole slew of replacements on the job, but the aviation biz survived without PATCO. One of the dumbest strikes ever. Probably rivaled by Eastern pilots who forced a showdown with scumbag Lorenzo that cost them their jobs and the airline itself.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 6:48pm.

Because of the strike, many of them were laid off since airlines had to reduce flight schedules to some cities by as much as 50% and overall flight schedules were trimmed back by 30% nation-wide in order to accommodate controller shortages.

Gee, what was the name of the union that turned its back on President Carter and supported Reagan.

As for Eastern's fate, it was sealed before the pilots struck. They were hemorrhaging money badly and Ole Frankie L. stripped them of any and all profitable assets and left them with the heavy lead.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


suggarfoot's picture
Submitted by suggarfoot on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 1:35am.

Unions came to be because of the greed of the very rich, remember the coal miners etc. People were treated like dogs.

When the Unions came in, there was greed in that too. The intent was very good, but then you had the lazy people that used it as an excuse not to work and hid behind the union.

Either way, the greedy and lazy, have played a major role in the continuing plight of the American worker caught between the two.


Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 8:38pm.

How much longer will one person, a Mr. Lorenzo, be totally blamed for Eastern's demise?

It was caused by many, just like the big banks going broke in 2008-09-10.
Difference is the government didn't bail them out since they didn't have anything worth having! And they weren't too big to fail!

Now: what caused the banks to fail?

suggarfoot's picture
Submitted by suggarfoot on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 1:53am.

He would address the pilots in the newspapers. Not smart. I remember when he made the announcement one time too many, if the pilots don't give us the concessions we want...we will have to close the doors.

That was it, he was so stupid. Delta got all of Eastern's cruise passengers with that last statement. They called Delta and stated, "this is the last straw, the last time someone spooks out passengers. We don't care if you cost more, we will pay it to have piece of mind."

Cruise companies got 'negotiated fares'. Fares that because of the size of the group, were much lower than anyone else would pay. Delta had backed off because Eastern was charging the cruise companies so little, there was no money left.

As for Lorezo, he WAS/IS a monster. I was on a plane with him once, I couldn't believe one person would hurt so many for a few pieces of silver. He destroyed CO and he went after Eastern with only one idea, to kill it and sells it's parts.

I have never understood that kind of mentality. What was it in the Bible, if you win the whole world and loose your own soul? something like that. Anyway, to me, people like that could be pitied, if they didn' hurt so many others with their sickness.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 8:52pm.

Well how about this? How much longer will the Demos blame President Bush for everything from A to Z even though the Demos fingerprint's are all over the place?
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


suggarfoot's picture
Submitted by suggarfoot on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:54pm.

and Air traffic controllers got screwed so bad many years ago, I don't now if they will ever catch up.

As for the pencil pushers, I've had some that make you beat your head against the wall. I think there is a lot of hiring your buddy going on, cause some of the rank and file can't walk and chew gum at the same time. That is a fact, yet they pull down salaries that are ridiculous for what they don't do.


Submitted by AtHomeGym on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 4:22pm.

Do you know any? Yes, there are some sorry federal employees, just like there are some sorry employees in the private sector. But while they may be sorry performers, federal employees share one common value--that of patriotism. I do not pretend to infer that patriotism is any sort of excuse for poor performance but you don't offer any stats, only an opinion==and that's OK, but not something to take to the bank.

Submitted by swac on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 10:00pm.

A wise man once said that "patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel."

We just have to remember President Nixon to understand what the wise man said.

Submitted by PTC Avenger on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 5:54pm.

Not all of them at least. But they are all looting the taxpayer's dollars, and I find it shameful.

Submitted by lion on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:22pm.

Federal employees are very patriotic. Afterall they have made decisions to serve our country and swore loyalty to the Constitution before starting their service

And they are highly paid because overall they are better educated, more skilled, and perform more difficult jobs with greater responsibilities than the average American worker. The Federal workforce is not comparable to the U.S. workforce in general.

You should be grateful for the service of the Federal employees.

And they are not "looting the taxpayer's dollars." Federal employees are taxpayers just like all American workers.

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 9:35pm.

that makes $68k+ a year plus those wonderful benefits.. is more educated, dedicated and have any more of a difficult job then say a Fortune 500 Company's Secretary?

You're right there is no comparison. Fed workers can't be fired or Laid off.. unlike their so called counterparts.

"A little matter will move a party

but it must be something great that moves a nation.

~Thomas Paine"


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:58am.

If you think you have what it takes go here and apply.

Be advised, you'll most likely need some level of, 'specialized experience' or ‘level of expertise’ beyond a high school diploma, to qualify for anything above a GS-5.

These jobs are open to all that apply. So to all of you blowhard’s that think Fed. workers are worthless, over paid lackeys, lets see if you can make the grade.

Go ahead, apply for one of these over paid jobs, if you think your current education or life experience qualifies you for one of them.

Just remember, most jobs will require a one year evaluation period. If you can't muster the required skill set, you’re gone. (yes you can be fired)

You have no idea how much continuing education is required to keep all of you ‘little people’ in line.

So if you think you have the stones, pony up, and apply for a job in the Fed. Govt. If you have what it takes than you too can be on the inside looking out.


Submitted by wildcat on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 12:17pm.

I found several jobs that I'm going to apply for. I'm tired of working two jobs to make up for a pay cut I received this year. There was a job listed for a mathematician! Woohoo! And a behavioral scientist......I couldn't believe it. Maybe my degrees will prove to be useful after all! Who knows? I will apply and find out!

Submitted by AtHomeGym on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 11:38am.

what's called a set of "Knowledges, Skills & Abilities" to the table or you won't be able to compete. Every job announcement will have a set of :"KSA's" and you must specifically identify those you have and be able to detail your ability to satisfy those requirements.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 10:58am.

Bonker$ will weave the word 'Bush' into a reply here.

CAP AND TRADE Congress in 2010


Submitted by Bonkers on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 1:57pm.

Why would you say such a thing? Bush,no? Hannity must have said it.

There is so much inaccuracy in Lindsey's "sayings" I'm not going to spread them around.

Federal workers got 2% last year and may get 2.9% pay raises in 2010.
None of which was approved by Obama!! Bush did sign that budget. (OOPS)

These are "median" numbers, not "average" numbers, anyway.
Geologists, for instance, do make more than bus drivers!

I suppose we could put all federal workers, except the President and Vice President, on the same pay scale as say: City officials.
PTCs run from $180,000 down to $18 and hour, don't they? And health and pensions.

They work hard also. Sweat just pours! Muscles get real sore. Butt.

S. Lindsey's picture
Submitted by S. Lindsey on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 9:17pm.

Please point out those inaccuracies... I would love for you to refute them. I mean the info did come from that hard Right wing site USA Today.

"A little matter will move a party

but it must be something great that moves a nation.

~Thomas Paine"


Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:10pm.

Obumbles has already said there will be no cost of living raise for federal employees. Get over it.

Some federal employees outside of the military are involved in saving lives every day. Some federal employees actually do work : FBI, CIA, NTSB, ATC.

Our "representatives"???? in D.C. are the only ones who are getting a raise this year, oh and probably obumbles himself. Get a clue.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 3:21pm.

2009 Federal Pay Raise:
3.9% Increase for Federal Employees

Dang Bonky!!! Dude, you are wrong again. Let's figure this together. 3.9% ACTUAL 2009 pay increase minus Bonkies 2.00% claim leaves a whopping 1.9% difference. Almost a 100% overall error by Bonker$. But..when you calculate numbers on Pelosi's Calculator it is understandable as to how you derived those numbers. Yep...Bush signed it on his way out, rubber stamping the pork laden budget congress screwed us taxpayers with.

I suppose we could put all federal workers, except the President and Vice President, on the same pay scale as say: City officials.

No Bonker$. But what we could do is put Federal workers on the same pay-scale as the vast majority of American Citizens are on. Care to take a stab as to the percentage Fed Employees get paid over Harry Reid's stinky subordinates?

Hmmm..wonder how many of us "stinky tourists" got pay raises this year compared to the measley 2% - 3.9% pay increases the federal hacks get in 09 & year 10.

CAP AND TRADE Congress in 2010


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 3:41pm.

....you're going to cause Bonkie to have another one of his 'acid flashbacks' from his youthful days in the 60's. He and our beloved Madame Speaker made quite the pair back in the day.


Submitted by Bonkers on Thu, 12/17/2009 - 6:25pm.

Comin in from Washington's 100 degree swampy like heat does make tourists stink. Just 20-30 of them put off enough sweat to rust the copy machines! The workers have to shower before coming to work, why not the stinky tourists?

Bush signed the 3.9% raise, Obama wanted 1.5% for next year---got 2.0%. The screw-ups of eight years just keep getting blamed on Obama!
Everyone told you Bush had no gravitas but Limbaugh convinced you he did.

By the way, paying people more can be done in more than just raising their base wage---just promote everyone beyond the need! Along with many other departments, the military (some due to Guard and Reserve carry overs)have enough Captains and Majors to last three more wars. Sarges also. I knew a local reserve outfit who had a Colonel, two Lt, Colonels, a Major, and inumerable Captains. Hard for them to find a Lt. to delegate to. Skipped the Sarges.

Same thing in D.C., and PTC.
Most Banks have 75 Vice-Presidents.

Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 2:18am.

your factual data from on military personnel inventories?


Submitted by Bonkers on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 5:05am.

Behind the "from on!"

You don't get it! I have no objection to the Pentagon, and others, paying people any way they have to do so. It is just a shame that they have to use devious methods to do so.
Our soldiers should be paid more, and if they are going to use married with kids people, pay them more also.
If we don't we will end up with inferior quality.

Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 9:08am.

...about the question or exclaim that I "don't get it"- I simply asked you where you get your data about personnel inventories from. You imply that the military has a surplus of officers and non-commissioned officers in specfic ranks. You said "the military (some due to Guard and Reserve carry overs) have enough Captains and Majors to last three more wars". I'd like to know where you get the data that demonstrates your statement. If it's too hard a question, just say so.


hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 9:28am.

That Bonker$ doesn't deal with facts, just his opinion, which seems to be that if anyone in the military had a brain, they could get a real job.

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 9:38am.

that Bonkers replies with a coherent answer to my question? Am I better off buying a lottery ticket and hoping for the big pay-out?


Submitted by Bonkers on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 12:02pm.

well, i'll tell you whut. you tell me your reference that what i sed is untrue and ile tell you mine ifn it is diferent!

When al them guys now in Iraq and Afghani cum hoem we will hve many more seniors than we nede, and their medals won't fit on their uniform.
scus mah erors--i am tard uf huntin sdtuff fer yoall.

Talkin bout opines!

Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sat, 12/19/2009 - 12:53pm.

Two Minute Google, Bonkers-

US Code Title 10- Armed Forces, Subtitle A- General Military Law, Part I- ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS, Chapter 2- Department of Defense, Sec. 115. Personnel strengths: requirement for annual authorization:
-STATUTE-
(a) Active-Duty and Selected Reserve End Strengths To Be Authorized by Law. - Congress shall authorize personnel strength levels for each fiscal year...

US Code Title 10- Chapter 32- OFFICER STRENGTH AND DISTRIBUTION IN GRADE, Part II- PERSONNEL; Sec 523, Authorized strengths: Commissioned officers on active duty in grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel and Navy grades of lieutenant commander, commander, and captain.
-STATUTE-
(a)(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), of the total number of commissioned officers serving on active duty in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps at the end of any fiscal year (excluding officers in categories specified in subsection (b)), the number of officers who may be serving on active duty in each of the grades of major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel may not, as of the end of such fiscal year, exceed a number determined in accordance with the following table: (omitted table for the sake of brevity).

Chap 1005 outlines caps for Reserve Personnel strengths.

So Bonkers, it would appear that service strength as well as officer strength is mandated thru law. Not my opinion- just the facts. So with the numbers mandated by law and approved by Congress to maintain an acceptable personnel inventory, I again ask you to tell me what your source is that says "the military (some due to Guard and Reserve carry overs) have enough Captains and Majors to last three more wars." I don't see an authorization to arbritarily promote excess personnel simply to give them a pay raise. What facts do I have to refute your claim? How about that the Chairman, Joint Chiefs said again this month that the Army's plan to give Soldiers 24 months dwell between deployments will be postponed yet again due to combat requirements? How about the Joint Chiefs testifying to Congress the stress on the force from multiple deployments? Not my opinion, Bonkers, just facts. So again, where is the data to support your claim? I can ask… you… more… slowly… if… that… helps….


Submitted by Bonkers on Sun, 12/20/2009 - 5:35am.

There are particular units, just as I said--I know of one, who are staffed as I described! They were about 40% officers.

Statistics tables from the government are usually two years old and do not list individual units staffing.

There is no other way to operate than have shortages at some units and overages at others, is there?
Are we to send a Captain we need to California who lives in Virginia?
This is why the training they get is so poor until call-up! The whole thing needs re-planning.
Again it is the management's fault, not the individual soldiers.

It is just a way to have them signed up in case of need.
What some Planning Colonel at the Pentagon figures out that we need isn't what congress will give him usually.

I don't think it would make any difference how slowly I spoke to you, you never can delve into the intricate functions--you have no imagination!

Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sun, 12/20/2009 - 8:30am.

I find your insults quite amusing, Bonkers, not to mention that you still can't anwer my original question- "Where do you get your personnel data from?"
I'd ask what experience you have with military service but I'm sure I'd only get another round of the same dribble. So thanks anyway... Sounds like the answer to my question then is that you have no data or source.


Silence Dogood's picture
Submitted by Silence Dogood on Sun, 12/20/2009 - 12:26pm.

Mr. Bonkers in the past has alluded to carrying a rifle, cleaning latrines and peeling potatoes.

Mr. Normal Guy should be ashamed of himself for attacking this heroic disabled war vet. Cleaning those crappers and pulling KP resulted in Gomer Bonkers being severely traumatized with effluent derangement syndrome, something for which I am certain he is highly decorated for.

Now stop disparaging this military veteran Mr. Normal Guy.


Normal Guy's picture
Submitted by Normal Guy on Sun, 12/20/2009 - 2:32pm.

You're right! What was I thinking? I will most certainly leave Bonkers with his reputation well intact. Thanks for setting me straight! Next topic, please!


Submitted by Bonkers on Sun, 12/20/2009 - 5:36am.

bold and narrow crap?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.