Rep. Fludd initiates probe of Fayette DFCS

Tue, 03/11/2008 - 4:31pm
By: John Munford

State Rep. Virgil Fludd (D-Tyrone) has joined with the Fayette County NAACP in convincing state officials to investigate the rate at which Fayette County Department of Family and Children Services “takes” minority children — that is, removes them from their homes for safety or other reasons.

Fludd announced last week that Georgia Department of Human Resources chief B.J. Walker has agreed to conduct the investigation along with a corresponding study by the University of Georgia.

“Cases will be pulled to determine why the children have been removed and to find if there are differences in removal with minority children,” Fludd said in a news release.

The report Fludd is alluding to, however, compared Fayette to other Georgia counties based on the rate of removal of all children related to the number of impoverished children in each county according to the 2000 Census.

The study dealt only with impoverished children.

The National Coalition for Child Protection Reform says Fayette took 107 children, not just those in poverty but from all households, in the year leading up to Feb. 28, 2007.

While that analysis resulted in a high “rate of removal” figure for Fayette at 5.5 times the national average, NCCPR also admitted in the report that the numbers aren’t solid because Fayette has relatively few children living in poverty compared to most other counties in Georgia.

That didn’t stop NCCPR from asking rhetorically in the report: “Is Fayette County, Ga. the child removal capital of America?”

Fludd’s announcement comes on the heels of last week’s news that state DFCS chief Mary Dean Harvey — one of Walker’s hires — was resigning from her position.

Harvey had come under fire after apparently orchestrating a behind-the-scenes effort to support a Fulton County DFCS assistant director who was arrested in Fayetteville for one felony count of cruelty to children for striking her 7-year-old daughter multiple times with a belt while the girl was clad only in her underwear.

NCCPR is a proponent of enhancing child safety by keeping children with their families instead of having the children removed into the care of foster families.

NCCPR suggests that counties like Fayette which don’t have a large number of children living in poverty might lead authorities to “confuse poverty with neglect.”

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by fayette fan on Wed, 03/12/2008 - 12:47am.

Does Fludd know any tune other than "The Man Is Keepin' Me Down Blues"? Clearly, he's an authority on DFCS since he's been so involved with it over the years -- NOT. It's funny that Fludd doesn't say one word about the safety of children . . . just their race. And if a black child died, Fludd and the race-baiters would claim DFCS only protects white children and doesn't care about protecting black children. (rolling eyes)

It's also very interesting that one of the members of the Fayette NAACP who is leading this effort at mob injustice has a nephew whose program to keep children in their homes in Detroit has a $1.5 million dollar budget. Isn't it possible that he smells an opportunty to get a state contract for his program and enlarge his budget by making the case against the Fayette DFCS office as the need for a pilot project conveniently featuring his program? Money -- and an inside connection to the head of DHR -- is a pretty strong motivator. But rather than waste time on what can't be proven, let's look a the facts.

First of all, DFCS doesn't have the authority to decide to remove children; the court decides whether a child should be removed from their abusive parent. Also, the NCCPR study is pure garbage; it compared completely unrelated statistics (2000 census poverty statistics and 2006 child removal rates) and Mr. Wexler was forced to acknowlege the weakness in his study when someone pointed out that a small change in a small number can look like a large percentage. Example: if 1 out of 10 children removed are black, that's a "removal rate" of 10% but if 2 out of 10 children removed are black, that's a "removal rate" of 20%. Either way, the number is very low but someone interested in discrediting the local office to protect a child-abuser friend of BJ Walker's from Chicago would stoop to the level of making a big lie out of a small number.

Fludd is just another race pimp and the allegations against the Fayette DFCS office are the product of a vendetta against the director for having followed procedure and not showing favortism to BJ Walker's Chicago homegirl. If you don't think so, check out this Investigative Report that sheds light on the relationships between some of the key players.

Submitted by oldbeachbear on Wed, 03/12/2008 - 6:35am.

I thought you called it right. DFCS is to protect the children. Black purple or pink. If a child is being mistreated in a home, it is merciful to take them out.
"It's also very interesting that one of the members of the Fayette NAACP who is leading this effort at mob injustice has a nephew whose program to keep children in their homes in Detroit has a $1.5 million dollar budget. Isn't it possible that he smells an opportunity to get a state contract for his program and enlarge his budget by making the case against the Fayette DFCS office as the need for a pilot project conveniently featuring his program? Money -- and an inside connection to the head of DHR -- is a pretty strong motivator. "

That really caught my eye. How can people be so conniving!

Submitted by pinkst on Wed, 03/12/2008 - 7:44am.

When it comes to opinion everybody got one. When will people start telling the truth about DFCS and the way they handle their cases. They claim that in evaluating a case that they have a book that they go by. The worker do not use any common sense, even after they have seen the doctors paperwork on the childs mental health, they still want to accuse the parents of misconduct even all of te other kids are fine. One county I really know about is Coweta County they are worse than Fayette. At lease Fayette did after a long battle finally came through with help.

Submitted by FayetteFlyer on Tue, 03/18/2008 - 11:57am.

The most thankless, no-win-situation job on the planet. If children are returned to an abusive household and then harmed, (sometimes fatally as we all heard in the news) occurs, then OMG! What's going on in DFCS?! I know every case is different but in my view, I favor erring on the side of protecting kids. If a situation even comes to considering removal of a child from a home then there must be a ligitimate reason for it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.