Voter-approved jail
may cost more By DAVE HAMRICK
Staff Writer
If
you want to vote on whether Fayette County issues
bonds and increases property taxes to pay for a
new jail and courthouse complex, the price tag
may be a little higher than if no vote is taken.
Revenue
bonds issued by an appointed facilities authority
wouldn't be subject to a referendum, but would
cost the average three-person household about
$450 less (spread over the 30-year life of the
bonds) than a general obligation bond with the
county government as the issuing body, according
to estimates from the county finance and
accounting office.
General
obligation bonds would cost about $1,750, while
bonds issued by a public facilities authority
would cost about $1,296, according to the
estimates. In the first year of issuance of the
bonds, yearly property tax payments would go up
$87.50 for general obligation bonds and $82.35
under an authority. After that, the tax cost
would be reduced each year, down to $25.02 and
$17.06, respectively, in the 30th year.
County
commissioners are studying the figures as they
wrestle with deciding how to fund the project,
which is expected to cost about $70 million.
Public facilities bonds and general obligation
bonds are two of four options being considered.
The
public facilities option was made viable last
week when the County Commission unanimously voted
to activate a long-dormant public facilities
authority. Commissioners will discuss naming a
panel of three to serve on that authority at
their next meeting tomorrow, Dec. 9.
Commissioner
Greg Dunn made the motion to activate the
authority, saying the group may decide not to use
it in the funding of the complex, but he wants
the board to have that option. It's one
more arrow in our quiver, he said in a
previous meeting.
The
third arrow in that quiver is the use of
certificates of participation, which would cost
about $1,315 for the average family of three over
the 30 years.
Option
four, a special purpose local option sales tax,
would cost the average household anywhere from
$1,393 to $1,929, spread over only five years
instead of 30, according to finance department
estimates.
The
range of estimates is based on how much
nonresidents shop in Fayette, something that
finance director Emory McHugh told the
commissioners is impossible to pin down. The
lower cost is based on 35 percent of the sales
tax being paid by nonresidents; the higher cost
is based on only 10 percent from outside the
county.
And
all of the figures are subject to fluctuating
interest rates, inflation rates and a host of
other variables, he cautioned the commissioners.
We're
going to have to study this for quite awhile to
make sure we fully understand the
ramifications, said commission Chairman
Harold Bost.
In
another jail-related action last week, the
commissioners approved a $3.8 million contract
with the county's engineering firm, Mallett and
Associates, to oversee the design and
construction of the complex.
Among
other duties, the company will advise the county
on every step of the project, provide preliminary
and final design, write specifications, handle
the bidding process for contractors, oversee
contractors and inspect their work during
construction.
Not
included in the contract fees are salaries for
the engineer's resident project representative
and other employees who perform on-site work.
Those services will be paid at 2.5 times each
person's salary for the time involved.
Mallett
also will be reimbursed for expenses such as
printing, mailing and auto mileage (at 30 cents a
mile).
|