Developer challenges
PTC traffic ordinance By MONROE ROARK
Staff Writer
The
county's largest developer is suing Fayette's
largest city in a traffic dispute a big
traffic dispute.
Pathway
Communities, Inc., once known as Peachtree City
Development Corp., charges that a newly enacted
Peachtree City ordinance meant to control
mounting traffic volumes on the city's west side
infringes illegally on Pathway's rights as a
property owner in that area.
Roughly
12 hours after its adoption last Thursday night,
the revised Peachtree City traffic impact
ordinance received its first official court
challenge.
Pathway
and Peachtree City Holdings LLC filed a lawsuit
Friday morning in Fayette County Superior Court
against the city, Mayor Bob Lenox, and the four
City Council members Robert Brooks, Carol
Fritz, Annie McMenamin and Jim Pace that
challenges the legality and
constitutionality of the ordinance,
according to official court records.
Attorney
George Rosenzsweig, who represents the plaintiffs
in the suit, stated in court records that the
city was placed on notice each time the traffic
ordinance was considered for a vote. He wants the
court to declare the ordinance unconstitutional
and invalid, and prohibit the city from enforcing
it.
The
ordinance was originally adopted Oct. 7 with a
4-1 vote (Pace voting against) and a revised
version passed last Thursday with a 4-0 vote
(Pace abstained).
The
ordinance sets specific guidelines for those
bringing new development to Peachtree City,
requiring traffic studies for any proposed
development along the Ga. Highway 54 corridor
between Ga. Highway 74 and the Coweta County
line. Developers could then face certain
mitigation requirements before permits are
issued. That might mean scaling back a planned
development or even delaying it until more road
capacity is built. Currently, all of Fayette is
under a federal clean air ban on building any new
or expanded state and federal roads.
The
council action is an attempt to stem the rising
tide of traffic congestion in the corridor, since
federal environmental concerns have stopped any
new road improvements for an indefinite period of
time.
Rosenzsweig,
who stated his opposition for the record at a
public hearing concerning the ordinance, charges
in the lawsuit that the ordinance constitutes the
taking of property without just compensation, in
violation of the Fifth Amendment, as well as the
taking of property without due process of law and
a lack of equal protection under the law, in
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Pathway
is the renamed major developer of Peachtree City,
and in the past two decades has been responsible
for planning much of the 15,000-acre city and
naming most of its streets and subdivisions. With
the city nearing build-out and with relatively
little residential property as yet undeveloped,
Pathway has expanded its large-development
expertise to Coweta and Henry counties, where it
currently has big residential projects underway.
Peachtree
City officials have not commented on the suit,
currently under review.
|