Friday, October 31, 2003

Brown-Tennant spat overshadows Kourajian’s challenge in Post 2

By J. FRANK LYNCH
jflynch@theCitizenNews.com

Dan Tennant, who appeared to be the lone man running in the race for Peachtree City Council for six months, now finds himself in the race of his life as campaigning enters the final days before the Nov. 4 election.
Tennant announced his intentions in April to seek reelection to his Post 2 seat and faced no announced opposition until Stuart Kourajian qualified in early September.
But keeping pace with Tennant all that time, tripping him up if not officially running against him, has been Mayor Steve Brown, who this week stepped up his unrelenting campaign to discredit the incumbent.
Brown claimed he was doing Tennant a “courtesy” when he fired off an e-mail over the weekend threatening to release “data” to metro Atlanta news outlets about Tennant’s voting and attendance records and campaign contributions.
The single-page, three-paragraph communication, widely circulated around the city since it surfaced Sunday morning, goes on to declare Tennant is to blame for the “grinding debacle” the city has faced in its relationship with the development authority, and concludes with an admission by Brown that “I know, firsthand, how it feels to have someone go to the press and to tear you apart.”
Brown concludes: “I know how it feels to be set up so I’m telling you ahead of time what I am doing.”
An incredulous Tennant fired off a rebuttal e-mail almost immediately Sunday, calling Brown “dangerous” and “conniving” and asking the community to pray for the mayor.
“I honestly believe he doesn’t realize the damage he continues to inflict on our city and its reputation,” wrote Tennant.
On Monday, Brown dismissed the e-mail and the tone of the words he chose, saying he just wants Tennant to be “truthful” in the campaign’s final days. He denied having plans to “set up” Tennant, or turn over documents to the local or Atlanta media. “This material is all available for public review,” he said.
Brown defended his choice of language this way: “The term ‘set up’ denotes maneuvering to harm without the other knowing it. I was being up front and avoiding the set-up. I was letting Tennant know that I will tell the truth in public.”
But Brown’s interpretation of the truth is clearly opposite his own, Tennant said, and the timing is suspect.
“I proudly stand on my four-year voting record,” Tennant declared, calling Brown’s “obvious attempt” to discredit him a week before the election “a long known political tactic employed by those who have little regard for fairness or accuracy. It is yet another bomb Brown feels compelled to drop.”
Countered Brown, “I find nothing dirty about being honest. I always cite my references and present my case clearly. Tennant is setting himself up to lose the election with his actions.”
On the sidelines, but clearly not forgotten, is Tennant’s opposition.
Stuart Kourajian has managed to remain relatively above the fray while the two political foes, who at one time were admitted allies, battle it out week after week. In fact, Tennant claims to side with Kourajian on some key issues.
“We’re not that different, and in the month I’ve known him we’ve become great pals,” Tennant said at the Oct. 21 candidate forum hosted by the Rotary Club.
Where that leaves Kourajian remains to be seen, but the first-time politician, a projects manager with SunTrust Bank who has lived in Peachtree City 15 years, is using the Tennant-Brown spat to his advantage.
Peachtree City’s elected officials “conducted themselves with professionalism and respect” until recently, he said. “We are entering some interesting times. We need to have leaders in place that can address the issues and that have the energy and the passion to continue the standards that we’ve come to expect.”
If the two men whose names appear on the ballot do, indeed, have something in common, it’s evident on the Internet, where both maintain campaign Web sites. That’s in contrast to the Post 1 candidates, none of whom have claimed receiving contributions.
Kourajian doesn’t seem concerned that in some circles, the Post 2 race is shaping up as a campaign for or against Steve Brown’s influence: Vote for Tennant to send a message to Steve Brown, or vote for Kourajian and give Brown what he will, no doubt, interpret as a political victory.
Indeed, Brown has avoided coming out in support of Kourajian, instead choosing to focus on what he perceives are Tennant’s weaknesses. And while Brown has made it no secret that he wants Tennant off the council to try and break the no-majority vote tallies on development authority business, there has been no indication that Kourajian would vote any differently.
“Kourajian appears to be more principled; however, the proof is in the pudding,” Brown said earlier this week. “Tennant’s pudding has spoiled.”


What do you think of this story?
Click here to send a message to the editor.

Back to News Home Page | Back to the top of the page