Big box rules being
studied
By JOHN MUNFORD
jmunford@TheCitizenNews.com
Perhaps 75,000 square feet
will be the magic number for Peachtree City's planned "big box"
regulations.
That could turn out to be the size limit for stores entering the city
under the general commercial zoning designation. Originally, the limit
was proposed to be 90,000 square feet about the size of the largest retail
store in town: the Kmart.
Reigning in the number of large retail stores moving to Peachtree City
is the main goal of the proposed regulations. But there are only a few
places left for massive retail stores to locate here, said Jim Williams,
the city's director of developmental services.
And the cat might already be out of the bag in relation to three proposed
big box stores: Home Depot, Wal-Mart, and an unnamed 140,000-sq. ft. store
that would locate at Kedron Village. Concept plans have been submitted
for all three projects, and that could keep them from being subjected
to the big box rules.
The proposed big box regulations will be discussed by the Planning Commission
at its meeting Monday night. But the final approval rests in the hands
of the City Council of Peachtree City.
Peachtree City resident Steve Brown, who lives near the possible location
for the Wal-Mart and Home Depot stores, thinks the regulations should
apply to them also. Unbridled retail growth, he argued, has serious repercussions.
He pointed to the Pavilion in Fayetteville as one example of how massive
retail stores can adversely affect a city. In addition to maintaining
a police presence there, that development has caused traffic woes and
other problems in Fayetteville, Brown said.
Such large stores tend to put existing stores out of business, which has
been seen in Fayetteville also, Brown argued. He pointed to the vacancies
at the Banks Crossing center, which will soon grow emptier as the Kmart
there closes.
"Wal-Mart has a grocery store component, so it doesn't just jeopardize
Kmart and Belk, but also your Krogers and Publixes," Brown said.
If a grocery store closes in Peachtree City, it could ruin the village
concept of having shopping areas
spread throughout the city, Brown argues.
"These are regional shopping centers," Brown said. "Traffic
will stream in and it will affect the rest of the city."
Doug Dillard, an attorney representing several developers, has already
questioned the legality of the ordinance. The big box regulations aren't
specific enough, he believes, especially in language regarding the traffic
and water management plan requirements.
The big box regulations are fashioned into an amendment to the city's
zoning ordinance. It wouldn't totally ban stores over 75,000 square feet
from coming to Peachtree City, but it would force them to seek a limited
use commercial zoning, which would likely involve more restrictions than
the ones proposed for the big box amendment, which include:
Development of a traffic management plan;
Development of a water management plan;
Providing assurances that the space won't be left unoccupied for an unreasonable
length of time should the store ever close;
No more than 75 percent of the lot can be covered by impervious surfaces.
Those requirements kick in on developments that have a tenant occupying
over 6,000 square feet of space or where the entire development consists
of over 100,000 square feet of retail space.
Brown has suggested using an incremental formula as opposed to a firm
cap on the store's size. That would allow the retail areas of Peachtree
City to grow along with the rest of the city without creating too much
of a burden on the infrastructure, he said.
"That allows everything to work on the scale we already have here
in Peachtree City," Brown said.
The battle against big box stores has been somewhat of an obsession for
Brown, who devotes an estimated 20 hours a week to studying the issue.
He took the concept for the incremental development idea from Al Norman,
a nationally known expert on the adverse effects allegedly created when
huge retail stores like Wal-Mart locate in communities.
Back
to News Home Page
| Back
to the top of the page
|