The Fayette Citizen-News Page

Wednesday, August 30, 2000

Impact fee ball in cities' court

By DAVE HAMRICK
dhamrick@TheCitizenNews.com

Fayette County officials this week once again are waiting for action from city officials concerning impact fees for a new county jail.

Impact fees are levied on new construction to help pay the costs of new facilities and services made necessary by growth.

County commissioners last week approved the latest plan for charging the fees after hearing that reaction among city leaders has been positive.

Under the latest plan, developers would have to pay $794.12 for each new home built, $8,663.12 for each new retail business over 50,000 square feet in size, $4,331.56 for retail businesses under 50,000 square feet, and $1,588.24 for non-retail construction such as industries, offices and churches.

County leaders hope to charge impact fees for the jail as well as for fire services, but the fire services portion won’t be collected in Fayetteville and Peachtree City, which have their own fire services.

Now that the county has approved the latest plan, the city governments must have public hearings and their councils must vote to approve the plan before it can be sent to the state Department of Community Affairs for approval.

Peachtree City Mayor Bob Lenox said the new plan looks fine to him, and it will probably be on a City Council agenda soon. “It’s a structure we can all live with,” he said.

If the cities sign off on the plan and DCA approves, then local officials will formalize the plan as an ordinance, which also will have to go through a round of public hearings at both the county and city levels before the county can begin collecting the fees.

County commissioners approved charging the impact fees for the jail back in the spring, with the caveat that all five local cities must agree to have the fees collected within their borders as well.

City officials agreed “in principle,” but when commissioners in June approved a mechanism for charging the fees and sent that packet to the cities for their input, most cities had problems with the specifics.

Fayetteville suggested redoing the plan and charging fees to businesses and industries as well as residences. When county officials reworked the figures using both residential and nonresidential sources, officials in Peachtree City and Tyrone objected to the formula for calculating the nonresidential fees, saying some industries would pay so much that they would be discouraged from locating in the city.

A series of negotiations and meetings of a joint county-city study committee ensued, and a series of new refinements to the plan was shuffled from the committee to all of the governments and back to the committee for more refinements.


What do you think of this story?
Click here to send a message to the editor.  

Back to News Home Page | Back to the top of the page