Charges,
counter-charges fly in F'ville city manager
controversy [Editor's
note: The following letter was released last week
by the Fayetteville City Council. It is from A.
Lee Parks, attorney for Main Street director
Sherri Anderson.]
Jan.
10, 2000
Dear
Mr. Bryant:
Our
law firm has been retained to represent Sherri
Anderson. Based upon the information I have been
provided, it appears that the work environment in
the office that is supervised and managed by you
has become one that falls beneath the minimum
standards required under federal law. Ms.
Anderson reports that, upon her return from
vacation, she was called by one of her
subordinates and advised that you had directed
her to show up for work in jeans so that
she could clean up the basement while the
subordinate would escort a special guest on a
tour of the Main Street district. This type
of demeaning directive would obviously have no
rational relationship to the job description of
Main Street director. It was an obvious attempt
to humiliate and retaliate against Ms. Anderson
is an effort to get her to resign her position.
Ms. Anderson will not resign her position and
intends to take action against you and, if need
be, the city of Fayetteville in order to protect
her right to a harassment free work environment.
Ms.
Anderson has documented the repeated invitations
made by you to join you at dinners, movies and
other purely social activities outside the
office. The fact that she has refused all of your
invitations to date has led to flagrant
retaliation such as reprimands, denial of pay and
other efforts to denigrate and otherwise limit
her ability to perform her job. While you may
attempt to deny that you have made advances
toward Ms. Anderson, there are a number of other
city employees who have come to Ms. Anderson and
expressed sympathy and understanding regarding
her situation. Moreover, your penchant for making
sexual advances to attractive female employees of
the city of Fayetteville has been documented by
several third parties, including Mandy Jones and
Anne Kirschner.
We
believe that, should we be put to the task of
actually assembling this quantum of evidence, it
will reflect a clear pattern of sexual harassment
and other sexually offensive conduct by you
during your tenure with the city. This includes
an incident of sexual harassment by you to a Main
Street merchant. We also have documentation that
you made the statement at a department head
meeting less than a year ago that you were
looking for a new personnel director
that was blonde, five feet seven inches tall,
slim good looking and when she stood against the
wall, her nose shouldn't touch before her body
did.
I
believe that a face to face meeting attended by
you and appropriate members of City Council to
hear Ms. Anderson's grievances is in order. We
need to determine whether or not there is a way
to resolve these issues before we move into the
judicial arena and it becomes public knowledge
due to the inevitable media coverage that will
ensue. I look forward to hearing from you or your
counsel at the earliest possible opportunity. It
is not Ms. Anderson's desire to harm the Main
Street program; however, she has reached the
point where she feels compelled to fight back
against the treatment she has suffered under your
direction.
A.
Lee Parks
|