PTC may reappoint
high bidder for attorney By MONROE ROARK
mroark@thecitizennews.com
After two delays,
the City Council of Peachtree City is expected to
reappoint its sitting municipal judge and current
city attorneys at tomorrow night's regular
meeting. The issue involves brewing controversy
about City Attorney James Webb's ties to a local
bank board, which includes developers who have
sued or are currently suing the city.
Letters to The
Citizen have raised questions about the propriety
of Webb defending the city against a pending
lawsuit by a fellow board member and investor in
the Bank of Georgia, Pathway Communities
president Steve Black. Pathway is suing the city
about a traffic impact ordinance that played a
role in the recent Home Depot decision affecting
the city's west side.
Webb, the current
city attorney, has written The Citizen demanding
retractions and apologies for printing the
letters, a legal precursor to filing a libel
suit.
Another letter
about the controversy appears on Page 6A.
Neither Judge A.
Mitchell Powell nor the firm of Webb, Stuckey and
Lindsey submitted the lowest rate for services,
but city manager Jim Basinger told the council in
a written statement that the costs are justified.
Staff feels
it is worth the additional investment to retain
the services of Judge Powell in this very
critical, high-profile position, he said.
While Webb, Stuckey and Lindsey did not
offer the lowest hourly rate, the firm's total
fees would probably be the lowest due to
increased [transportation costs] for those firms
outside Peachtree City.
Webb, Stuckey and
Lindsey was the only Peachtree City firm that bid
on the city attorney position, which it has held
since 1992, the same time Judge Powell ascended
to the bench.
The city originally
sent out notices in November that it would
consider bids for these positions, but some
confusion on the original request for proposals
necessitated a rebid in December.
Glover and Davis,
the Newnan firm of which Judge Powell is a
member, was the low bidder for the city attorney
post the first time around, and city staff
recommended them based mainly on price, saying
that Webb, Stuckey and Lindsey has provided
excellent service for the past several years.
But when the
council discussed the bids in December, it was
revealed that some confusion existed as to the
city attorney and solicitor positions. Webb,
Stuckey and Lindsey are currently filling both
roles.
But some bidders
opted solely for the solicitor job, which
prompted the city to solicit bids a second time
and more clearly state the requirements.
The council elected
to combine the positions of solicitor and city
attorney, under which conditions Glover and Davis
did not submit a bid.
Powell bid again
for the municipal judgeship, which effectively
knocked his firm out of the running for the other
job, since the same firm could not represent the
city as solicitor and serve on the municipal
bench.
The matter was to
be decided by the council during February, but
Councilman Robert Brooks was unable to attend
either of the council's regularly scheduled
meetings in February.
As for Webb,
Stuckey and Lindsey, their bid was the same both
times: a $750 monthly retainer, $130 per hour for
attorneys and $70 per hour for paralegals and
clerks.
That was not the
lowest bid among the five applicants, but it was
the only bid received from a Peachtree City firm.
There were two bidders from Atlanta and one
apiece from Fayetteville and Jonesboro.
Mayor Pro Tempore
Annie McMenamin has made clear that she would
abstain from any vote to retain Webb, Stuckey and
Lindsey, since her daughter is a lawyer with that
firm.,
|